Just joined and a question

Discussion in 'Misc. Quadcopter & Multirotor discussions' started by nasr, Mar 6, 2013.

  1. nasr

    nasr New Member

    I've started interest in quadcopters. My question is, what would you recommend for a beginner that would likes to take ariel video as a hobby?
     
  2. nasr

    nasr New Member

    Saw this in the other section

    Hubsan Quads X4, but what camera would I need to get to attach to this one?
     
  3. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    The Hubsan Quads X4 is better as your 2nd or 3rd quadcopter! I tried it as my first and promptly destroyed it......but I have another now that I have more hours under my belt and I love it!

    In general, the Syma X1 for less than $40 delivered is a great first copter - BUT, if you want to get one with a camera, I'd suggest the 959 from MassiveRC (if you are in the US, otherwise you can get it elsewhere).

    Even if you get this quad, disconnect and remove the camera until you learn how to fly it well. That way you'll be sure to know what you are doing once you start taking videos.

    http://www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/69-wl-toys-v959.html
    That price includes the camera!

    The Hubsan Quads is tiny and cannot properly carry a camera, but it is good for indoor flying and also flies well in the wind outdoors. Even though it is small, it is a more advanced quad than the Syma in terms of what it can do (it's more like a race car - turns on a dime, etc.)
     
    nasr likes this.
  4. figgoat

    figgoat New Member

    nasr likes this.
  5. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    :)
    They'll be about 80 years old when they finish reading all of that!

    I'm with you. Look at the blacksheep videos with lust - figure you'll get there in about 5 years, then buy a couple cheapos while you look at the heavy lifters...

    Of course, some folks may never want or need heavier lift. If flying is just for some learning and stress relief, the Hubsan Quads, Eye one or other minis and micros may be all you ever need! My Hubsan Quads (and some parts) come with me almost where ever I go for outside flying - even in pretty strong winds. I even put it in my backpack when I take a long walk or bike ride - it provides a nice break at the 1/2 way point in a park somewhere (luckily I am in Florida for a few weeks!).
     
    nasr likes this.
  6. figgoat

    figgoat New Member

    "
    nasr

    "My question is, what would you recommend for a beginner that would likes to take ariel video as a hobby?"

    I don't think he is going to carry much of a camera with a micro. He needs something bigger to carry a camera. Go with a name brand 450 class quad, like DJI Flamewheel or Multiwiicopter Scarab and you'll have lots of peers and help.

    I'm flying FPV all the time now...haven't LOS flown for a long time now, except to set up and trim, and that's just a quick hover or some circuits.
     
    nasr likes this.
  7. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    Some of the minis are starting to have cams, but you are correct that it's hard to fit the high quality ones - and FPV together - on the smaller quads.

    The new v959 from WL Toys has a medium-res onboard video cam which works fairly well, but doesn't come stock with FPV. In fact, I don't know of any stock units with FPV in the "hobbyist" price range, except for the Parrot AR Drone, which has just about everything in a $300 package, but is a "toy" because of the limited range.

    I guess it's important to define a budget as well as one's intention in the hobby! But just about everyone is in agreement with the idea of starting small so you don't destroy an expensive machine!

    Also, it is important for folks to keep in mind their level of handiness and comfort with "scratch builds" or even kits. Maybe we should start using the term "plug and play" in this industry! Of course, even with plug and play you end up pulling out the soldering iron after you destroy a motor, etc.

    In terms of plug and play, starting with one of the minis (Syma X1, WL 900 series, etc) is probably the way to go, and then save up your money for a DJI Phantom($700 plus camera)....or a bit more DIY with a Dualsky Hornet, etc.

    If, however, you long for the "build one" side of the hobby...then there is no limit to the options! In that case, going over to RC groups and reading the suggestions is a good way to go. The experts like figgoat seem to suggest the DJI frames as the least troublesome and with the largest knowledge base. I've priced out those frames and complete with everything they seem to get into the same price range as the RTF Phantom, so building is more a matter of customizing and enjoyment than of saving a lot of money or time.

    Within a few years I expect most every $500+ quad to come complete with FPV and GPS. The prices may even fall from there as the volume builds up (mass production).
     
    nasr likes this.
  8. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    Nasr, just so we don't confuse you - there are two items being talked about..

    1. Aerial Video or Stills - these are taken from cameras like the Keychain cams (808) or the GoPro, etc. - however, you are controlling the quadcopter from the ground and you don't see what it sees - rather you see the pics and video after it lands.

    2. FPV - this is First Person View - meaning that you look through a set of googles or to a screen and you see what the quadcopter sees. This is often a complete additional system to the regular video, as it requires a completely different type of connection between the ground the the quad...usually analog video similar to security cams, etc.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Person_View

    An example of an FPV systems for quads is at:
    http://www.foxtechfpv.com/horyzonhd-full-hd-1080p-fpv-camera-v3-p-877.html
     
    nasr likes this.
  9. nasr

    nasr New Member

    Thank you guys. I will do more research and see what I should get. Maybe I could even build one to my specs. However, this will have to wait until I have a better and thorough idea of how these systems work.
     
  10. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    If you are good with a soldering iron, this can provide some good experience. If not, it's a lot of frustration.
    The prices are not too much lower - for build your own. But the experience is good.
     
    nasr likes this.
  11. nasr

    nasr New Member

    Yeah. I have experience with soldering. And, I think it's better to build one step by step to get that feeling of accomplishment. :D
     
  12. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    It's a personal preference. I've ripped my micros down to the last screw and soldered on new motors, etc. with no problems. But I'd rather fly and modify than build and troubleshoot. I was a HAM radio guy and loved building my own antennas, but never quite got the nerve to build on of those Heathkit radios! I have great respect for the quality control of mass production!

    I think my next machine is going to be the Dualsky Hornet - mid-sized, assembles in an hour or so, and can probably accept a lot of modifications and improvements. It also has a nice payload if I do want to fly some cams, although that is not going to be my main use. I'll also keep up a stable of micro's and minis.....
     
    nasr likes this.
  13. nasr

    nasr New Member

    I went ahead and bought the v959. Let see how it goes.
     
  14. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    Nice - I just did a review on it.....
    https://www.droneflyers.com/2013/03/review-wltoys-v959-2-4g-4-axis-4ch-rc-quadcopter-with-camera/

    I think it will give some good hands-on practice in low winds while you research your heavier build.
    I am starting on a Dualsky Hornet soon....which is not a "build", but it is an assemble and program/install receiver model. This will provide a much heavier lift capability for me to fiddle around with various cams and other payloads.
     
    RcColorado likes this.
  15. JMoors

    JMoors New Member

    Just getting started as well. I like the looks and price point of the V959 and will order one this weekend. So you say to remove camera first and learn to fly it and then put it , the camera back. Okay I will do that. I also saw a FPV system that looked interesting, the Fat Shark Predator V2. Knowing nothing of these systems nor quad copters, do you think I could mount the Predator V2 in place of the camera that comes with the V959?
    Thanks, John
     
  16. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    Just a suggestion, but if you have not ordered yet you could wait a week or two and get the newest version of the v959, which is the v222. It is a bit more stable...

    As far as other cameras, I think this could be tough without some shopping around in order to find cams and electronics that are extremely light weight. Lots of people have done it, but they are generally handy with a soldering iron and electronics. I think you have to keep the weight of all of it under about 13 grams in order to make it fly well.

    There are a number of mini and micro quads coming out which include FPV systems - basic, but functional. So another option is to get a starter quad and learn the sticks and maybe clip a keychain cam on for fun and then get a unit set up for FPV when you are confident in your control, etc.
     
  17. JMoors

    JMoors New Member

    Good suggestions ... any additional info on the V222? Same price point? I can get the V595 for $79 and that includes shipping. V222 also have a camera? Thanks again,
    John
     
  18. webman

    webman Administrator Staff Member

    V222 is an upgraded version of the same exact copter - they will probably eventually discontinue the older one. It has a camera.
    The price is similar - maybe $10 more but worth the money if it works as advertised...that would mean better stability, which is nice for a cam-carrying copter.

    In the states, I usually suggest ordering from MassiveRC because they personally inspect and test each unit which saves you a LOT of potential problems. They also stock parts, etc.
    They don't have the v222 in yet as it just came out a week or two ago and there were some production problems.....

    If you are going to put your own cam in, the v212 is the new stabilized unit without the cam.
    http://www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/116-wl-toys-v212-rtf-space-ship-canopy.html
     
  19. JMoors

    JMoors New Member

    Okay thank you for the info ... I'll get a message off to MassiveRC and see if they have any idea when they will get the V222 in and what the price will be. I assume the additions for the V595 will work with the V222, that being the water cannon etc ... they sound like fun additions .. ;-)
     
  20. RcColorado

    RcColorado New Member

    Just to add my 2 cents about the Hornet 460.

    I've been trying to assemble mine for just about a week now and seem to run into problems about every step I take with it. From the screws provided not going in all the way (even with superhuman strength and pliers) to ESC programming (wires not fitting a standard spektrum receiver without making modifications) the Hornet has fought me the entire way lol. This is a little embarrassing to say, but I've probably put in well over 10 hours attempting to get this setup to fly with no luck. I've posted on forums, watched detailed youtube videos, been emailing customer support to help troubleshoot, practically memorized the manual but still can't get it flying. Granted, I'm no engineering genius or anything, but the 30 min guarantee couldn't be further from the truth..

    I'd be interesting in hearing about how your build of the Hornet goes.

    I still am impressed with the actual performance of an "assembled Hornet" from what I've seen, just working my way through the assembly process has been the challenging part.
     

Share This Page